|
Campaign
for the Accountability of American Bases |
Dear Friends
The world is in a terrible muddle. We write at a time when we are teetering on the brink of a nuclear conflict over the issue of Kashmir. However if the US, UK, France etc can have nuclear weapons why should we be surprised if other countries are eager to join the nuclear club? The recent signing of agreements between the US and Russia, ostensibly to cut the number of nuclear weapons on both sides, is not as transparent as it has been portrayed. Some interesting alliances have been and are being made by the US and Russian governments. However deals made behind the scenes will probably later reveal that the true picture is more complicated. States have their own interests at heart after all; Russia supports the building of a nuclear power station in Iran and the US in North Korea.
There is an on-going programme of ballistic missile tests by the
US. We write as the US withdraws from the ABM Treaty which will give the ‘green light’ to immediate construction of the AMD system in Alaska. Furthermore the United States government wants the strategically placed testing range of Kwajalein Island (Marshall Islands in the Pacific) for another 40 years. They are not willing to pay more than the current lease fees to test missiles up to 2043. More and more money for research and development is spent on weapons of war. At home Menwith Hill and Fylingdales (key bases for the AMD system) are an anathema to the beautiful areas
of North Yorkshire. The irony is that the more these bases (and all US bases in this country and around the world)
are fortified the more vulnerable they become. All our security is being put at risk. What do we have to do?
We have to speak out, join in the growing protest and probably in the end resort to civil disobedience in order to bring those who make major decisions about our
lives to their senses…… details of the next demonstrations - Menwith
Hill (4 July)…PLEASE COME AND SAY INDEPENDENCE FROM AMERICA AND NO TO ‘STAR WARS’.
|
INDEPENDENCE
FROM AMERICA
|
FYLINGDALES
(near Pickering, North Yorkshire)
FELTWELL
(near
Thetford, Norfolk)
Protest re ‘Star Wars’: |
SHANNON AIRPORT
(near
County Clare, Republic of Ireland)
US Air Force on Exercises around coast: Last night it emerged that the USAF was granted
permission to use Irish air space for what was described as “routine training exercises”. The move is likely to lead to political row for the
Government with peace groups bound to claim that the exercises are breaching Ireland’s military neutrality. Hill-walkers in Kerry were stunned yesterday to see
two large four engined USAF C-130 Hercules fly by in formation just off Kenmare Bay at low level. The two aircraft followed the coast and then slowly
retraced their route before heading back out to sea. One walker, Paul Michaels, happened to have a pair
of binoculars and was stunned to see USAF markings on both aircraft. “I couldn’t believe they were American air force
planes. They were so quiet they just seemed to glide by,” he explained. Designed almost 50 years ago, the planes –
nicknamed ‘Herkybirds’ – are the transport workhorses of the USAF, though they are also used by US Special Forces and as a gunship. Officials in Shannon Air Traffic Control insisted
that all the aircraft involved are unarmed and will be carrying only their allotted air-crews with no combat forces involved. The four-day exercises will include routine take-off
and landing approaches, formation flying, navigational tests and basic manoeuvres. (Ralph Riegel, The Irish Independent1 June 02) USAF practice manoeuvres above Shannon: I got out there and met my colleague who told me that the grey military aircraft he first spotted had disappeared, but that there was another military Aircraft near the Westair hanger. So, I walked down and sure enough there’s a big
old DC-9 just sitting there. It’s marked United States NAVY and registered RS 4605 part of VR-61 with the name ‘City of Everett’. He told me that Shannon was becoming 'more and more popular with the US Air force and Navy' and that two C-130s had already been through (one which had 'broken down' and another to collect the passengers from the first one) and that two more Hercules were coming through shortly. [So make that 7 aircraft for now okay.] We waited around for them, and expected them to land and taxi to a standpoint. Instead, we saw the first one come in fast, touch down briefly and then pull back, while pushing up the power. It climbed steeply for a few seconds and then banked into a turn, and flew east about 500ft up, before turning tightly for another approach. I thought maybe the pilot had aborted the landing but when I saw the second Hercules do the same, I knew they were practicing what is called a 'touch-and-go' landing. This is used sometimes in war zones where it is not safe to land and stop, so the cargo plane will instead touch down briefly, and drop cargo out the back door while still moving, then increase power and take off again. It's a tricky manouvre. a wrong move could end up in
a crash landing on the airfield. More worrying are the low-level passes over Shannon and the tight turns that they do for the approach. I watched these two aircraft make
high powered climbs, then bank sharply and fly back over Shannon town, make another tight turn and come down for another touch-and-go on the runway. for about 30 minutes,
we had this going on above our heads, both of them up there at the same time, sometimes in opposite directions, sometimes approaching each other above the town. Really
wish I had the video camera. There's a big build up going on somewhere, and my
local bookies reckon it's going to be Iraq. Whatever the odds on the attack, I wouldn't bet any harm will come to Saddam, but I'm sure lots of Iraqi citizens will be “redesignated
as collateral damage” by the Pentagon. I hope not, but if they do, then we can't say that Ireland didn't play a part in that. (On the spot report by Tim Hourigan of ‘Refueling Peace’ – a direct action campaign to monitor and stop US military refueling in Ireland. More details on
their website:
www.refuelingpeace.org
). [Aer Lingus announced that it’s pilots strike was
over on Tuesday 4 June … coincidence or just convenient?] |
SELECTION OF PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS Q:
Norman Baker:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will ensure that there is parliamentary approval prior to a deployment by the US of national missile defence facilities in the UK. [31927] A:
Mr. Hoon:
President Bush has made clear that he has not yet decided what sort of missile defence system
he will ultimately seek to deploy. We have received no request from the US for the use of sites in the UK for missile defence purposes, and it remains premature to
indicate how we would respond to any specific request. [11 February 02] Q: Dr. Tonge: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions his Department has had with UK firms bidding for work on the US-initiated programme of national missile Defence; and if he will make a statement. [53597] A:
Mr. Bradshaw:
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has not had any direct discussions with UK firms in
relation to specific bids related to current US proposals for missile defence. Staff at the British embassy in Washington regularly give general advice to UK firms
wishing to do business with the US Department of Defense (including the Missile Defense Agency) but have not had any discussions on specific bids on the US missile
defence programme. [9 May 02] Q:
Mr. Hancock:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the prospects are for a missile defence system that
can cover the European countries of NATO; and if he will make a statement. [53692] A:
Mr. Hoon:
The United States has made clear that it wishes to see friends and allies protected from the
emerging threat posed by ballistic missiles. However, it has yet to put forward any detailed plans. [2 May 02] Q:
Dr. Tonge:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions his Department has had with (a)
EU member states and (b) the EU Commissioner for External Relations, regarding a European Union view on national missile defence.
[53599] A Mr. Hoon:
None. Missile defence
is not a matter for the European Union. [2 May 02] Q: Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they owe money to the United States Government as a result of World War Two debt; if so, how much is owed; when it will be repaid; and what representation they have made to the United States Government concerning the debt being cancelled.[HL4422] A:
Lord McIntosh of Haringey:
Under a 1945 agreement, the United States Government lent the United Kingdom a total of $4,336
million (around £1,075 million at 1945 exchange rates) in war
loans. These loans were taken out under two facilities: (1)
a line of credit of $3,750 million (around £930 million at 1945 exchange rates); and (2) a lend-lease loan facility of $586 million (around £145 million at 1945 exchange rates), which represented the settlement with the United States for lend-lease and reciprocal aid and for the final settlement of the financial claims of each government against the other arising out of the conduct of the Second World War. Under the agreement the loans would be repaid in 50
annual installments commencing in 1950. However, the agreement allowed deferral of annual payments of both principal and interest if necessary because of prevailing
international exchange rate conditions and the level of the United Kingdom's foreign currency and gold reserves. The United Kingdom has deferred payments on six
occasions. Repayment of the war loans to the United States Government should therefore be completed on 31 December 2006, subject to the United Kingdom not choosing to
exercise its option to defer repayment. As at 31 March 2001, principal of $346,287,953
(£243,573,154 at the exchange rate on that day) was outstanding on the loans provided by the United States Government in 1945. The Government intend to meet their
obligations under the 1945 agreement by repaying the United States Government in full the amounts lent in 1945 and so no representation has been made. [27 May 02] |
American military chiefs are developing
plans to use Valium as a potential weapon against enemy forces and to control hostile populations, according to official documents seen by The Observer. (..) US documents
reveal that two years ago the Pentagon commissioned scientists at Pennsylvania State University to look at potential military uses for a range of chemicals known as
calmatives. The scientists concluded that several
drugs would be effective to control crowds or in military operations such as anti-terrorist campaigns. The drugs they recommended for 'immediate consideration' included
diazepam, better known as the tranquilliser Valium, and dexmedetomidine, used to sedate patients in intensive care. The scientists advised that these drugs could ‘effectively
act on central nervous system tissues and produces a less anxious, less aggressive, more tranquil-like behaviour’. Other official documents reveal
how genetically engineered micro-organisms to destroy equipment but not harm troops are also being considered by US military scientists as 'non-lethal' weapons. One
proposal from the Office of Naval Research in Arlington, Virginia, proposes creating genetically modified bugs that would corrode roads and runways and produce 'targeted
deterioration of metal parts, coatings and lubricants of weapons vehicles and support equipment as well as fuels'. 'The US and UK interpret the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)
differently regarding riot control agents (RCA). The UK interpretation considers them to be chemical weapons under the CWC and thus proscribed; the US view is that they
are not banned under that agreement. This could lead to difficulties in combined operations in certain circumstances, a situation compounded by the fact that the UK is a
signatory to the European Convention of Human Rights, which further governs the use of NLW [non-lethal weapons].' (Antony Barnett,The Observer, 26 May 02) |
Thank you so much to everyone who has so
generously sent contributions over the years to enable us to do this important work. Each year
the financial demands increase. This year will be no exception.
The largest demands from CAAB’s budget are:
Because of these and other financial demands it has meant that we have never been able to claim our full expenses. The reassurance of regular contributions by Banker’s Order (small or large) is an enormous help. People often ask us how they can help. Committing a regular amount really would help us.
|
PLEASE NOTE: The Co-op bank will no longer accept Banker’s Orders direct. If you do decide to set up a Banker’s Order for CAAB please would you fill in the form below and arrange with your own bank who will then forward it on to our bank. Bankers Order To: The Manager of……………….………
Bank Address of Bank………………………………… ………………………………………………….. Sort Code:………… Account
number…………. Please pay the Co-operative Bank
PLC, 6 Tyrell Street, Bradford, BD1 1RJ For the account of Campaign for the
Accountability of American Bases (CAAB) Account number: 50095311 the sum of
£………. on receipt of this authorisation Signed…………………………………………... Name……………………………………………. Address…………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………….. Post Code………………………………………..
|
NSA
Menwith Hill Saturdays - 1 June, 3 August, 5 October, 7 December from 2pm - 3pm outside the Main Entrance. ‘RAF’ Fylingdales Saturdays - 6 July, 7 September, 2 November from 12pm - 1pm outside the Approach Road Entrance at Fylingdales, Near Pickering, North Yorkshire Moors. Contact numbers for both Meetings:
|